What if it Work?
#42
What if There Was No Wood?
What if it Works?
Surprise. Wood is actually a common material. Anything from paper, to equipment, to even ... construction.
So we could just tell by at all these things, how it would be if we didn't have wood.
No paper. And no houses to put it that way.
So let's just examine this idea, and take it a step further.
1. What we would think it would be like?
With no houses. There no place to live. People would have to build with another material. Concrete.
Those houses are more expensive and take more time. But you could build houses with that.
But concrete is only good for certain types of houses. In the end, wood is always better. But if we don't have wood ... then, not only will houses be more expensive. There also wouldn't be any wood products.
No paper too.
You may be asking, it's not such a big difference. We could replace all these things.
Ya but then what about this?
No forest less food.
Also fewer animals too. Forest basically serve as a shelter for small animals. They could run up in the trees, had in the shade. But without forests, all those animals die out.
2. What it would be like?
One word for you: Bad. When we look at it this way, we can't survive without wood. Or forests. It just not possible.
We can't even do artificial food. Because we don't know how to make every single type of food. And we would only do it with exciting food.
Unless you want to eat this:
But then, what's a good thing to this?
Stumps me.
What do you think?
- What if it Work?
Team
(Because What if it Works? Was Taken)
#42
What if There Was No Wood?
What if it Works?
Surprise. Wood is actually a common material. Anything from paper, to equipment, to even ... construction.
So we could just tell by at all these things, how it would be if we didn't have wood.
No paper. And no houses to put it that way.
So we could just tell by at all these things, how it would be if we didn't have wood.
No paper. And no houses to put it that way.
So let's just examine this idea, and take it a step further.
With no houses. There no place to live. People would have to build with another material. Concrete.
Those houses are more expensive and take more time. But you could build houses with that.
But concrete is only good for certain types of houses. In the end, wood is always better. But if we don't have wood ... then, not only will houses be more expensive. There also wouldn't be any wood products.
No paper too.
You may be asking, it's not such a big difference. We could replace all these things.
Ya but then what about this?
No forest less food.
Also fewer animals too. Forest basically serve as a shelter for small animals. They could run up in the trees, had in the shade. But without forests, all those animals die out.
One word for you: Bad. When we look at it this way, we can't survive without wood. Or forests. It just not possible.
We can't even do artificial food. Because we don't know how to make every single type of food. And we would only do it with exciting food.
Unless you want to eat this:
But then, what's a good thing to this?
Stumps me.
What do you think?
- What if it Work?